Search Issue Tracker

Fixed

Fixed in 2020.3.41f1, 2021.3.12f1, 2022.1.23f1, 2022.2.0b11, 2023.1.0a15

Votes

12

Found in

2020.3.39f1

2021.3.9f1

2022.1.15f1

2022.2.0b6

2023.1.0a9

Issue ID

UUM-12875

Regression

No

[Android] SByte type is considered to be not primitive when compiling IL2CPP code

--

-

How to reproduce:
1. Open the user’s attached “Buffer.BlockCopy Bug” project
2. Build and Run the “SampleScene” Scene on Android
3. Observe the Player

Expected result: “Block copy successful” is printed out
Actual result: ArgumentException is thrown

Reproducible with: 2020.3.39f1, 2021.3.9f1, 2022.1.15f1, 2022.2.0b6, 2023.1.0a9

Reproduced on: macOS 12.5 (Intel)

Reproducible with devices:
VLNQA00472 - Samsung Galaxy A52 (SM-A525F), CPU: Snapdragon 720G (SM7125), GPU: Adreno 618, OS: 12
VLNQA00414 - Galaxy Note10+ 5G (SM-N976V), CPU: Snapdragon 855 SM8150, GPU: Adreno 640, OS: 9
VLNQA00409 - Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (SM-F926B), CPU: Snapdragon 888, GPU: Adreno 660, OS: 11
VLNQA00331 - HUAWEI P20 lite (ANE-LX1), CPU: HiSilicon Kirin 659, GPU: Mali-T830, OS: 9
VLNQA00268 - Samsung Galaxy S10+ (SM-G975F), CPU: Exynos 9 9820, GPU: Mali-G76, OS: 10.0.0

Thrown error message:
ArgumentException: Object must be an array of primitives.
at System.Buffer.ByteLength (System.Array array) \[0x00000] in <00000000000000000000000000000000>:0
at System.Buffer.BlockCopy (System.Array src, System.Int32 srcOffset, System.Array dst, System.Int32 dstOffset, System.Int32 count) \[0x00000] in <00000000000000000000000000000000>:0
at BufferBlockCopyIssue.Start () \[0x00000] in <00000000000000000000000000000000>:0

  1. Resolution Note (fix version 2023.1.0a15):

    Fixed in 2023.1.0a15

  2. Resolution Note (fix version 2022.2.0b11):

    Fixed in 2022.2.0b11

  3. Resolution Note (fix version 2022.1.23f1):

    Fixed in 2022.1.23f1

  4. Resolution Note (fix version 2021.3.12f1):

    Fixed in 2021.3.12f1

  5. Resolution Note (fix version 2020.3.41f1):

    Fixed in 2020.3.41f1

Log in to vote on this issue

Comments (3)

  1. johnluxford

    Oct 06, 2022 16:29

    Just ran into this as well after upgrading from 2020.3.36f1 to 2020.3.40f1 which we did to use Process-for-IL2CPP due to the lack of Process support in the IL2CPP compiler. Unfortunately for us, this could have a big impact on an upcoming product launch.

  2. smoothics

    Oct 01, 2022 19:04

    It's also in 2021.3.11f1.

  3. Radiogaga84

    Sep 07, 2022 12:33

    I experienced this issue in 2021.3.9f1

Add comment

Log in to post comment

All about bugs

View bugs we have successfully reproduced, and vote for the bugs you want to see fixed most urgently.

Latest issues

See all new issues