Search Issue Tracker
By Design
Votes
24
Found in
4.3.0f4
Issue ID
575251
Regression
No
Rigidbody2d with kinematic rigidbody will not cause OnTriggerEnter2d
To reproduce:
1. Create two 2D cubes with colliders 2d
2. Attach a rigidbody 2D to one of the cubes and make the other cube a trigger
3. Attach a script with OnTiggerEnter2D (and some kind of debug message) to the rigidbody cube
4. Enter play mode and move the cube into the other cube - the debug message should get printed
5. Change the rigidbody 2d to kinematic - the debug message is no longer printed, OnTriggerEnter2d is no longer being called
Explanation: kinematic bodies (specifically colliders attached to those bodies) only collide with dynamic bodies.
The allowed collisions for body types are therefore:
Kinematic can collide with Dynamic
Dynamic can collide with Static, Dynamic & Kinematic
Static can collide with Dynamic
Add comment
All about bugs
View bugs we have successfully reproduced, and vote for the bugs you want to see fixed most urgently.
Latest issues
- Rider package is not loaded until there are compilation errors in Assets
- [Catalina] DriveInfo.AvailableFreeSpace returns 0 on macOS Catalina
- IndirectArgs do not bind properly when using DX12
- [OSX] Editor windows flicker in Play Mode when dragging and docking windows with Metal Editor Support enabled
- Popup Window propagates input in its calling Window underneath and all other Windows
anguaji
Sep 18, 2014 10:45
For anyone struggling with this issue (as I was yesterday after grabbing the PSM Unity which is 4.3.4) - setting your rigidbody collider that would normally be kinematic to NOT kinematic (ie physics has an effect on the object) and then setting the gravity scale of that item to 0 (ie physics has an effect but gravity does not cause item to drop) helped me fix my problem. Good luck to anyone with this issue!
ShadowM8
Aug 26, 2014 01:01
I know this is old but for our new project we were going to use the 2D tools and this issue is causing a lot of difficulties.
AronTD
Jul 07, 2014 22:34
This is awful.
FireMutant
Jun 20, 2014 03:59
2D Physics is useless as long as this issue exists. I'm at a standstill.
Simon Says
May 24, 2014 22:06
This just renders the whole 2D physics package unusable, since 3D physics can be used instead and relied upon to behave as expected. Bad design.
KocorJIA3ue
May 24, 2014 08:45
Fix it please
metinevren
May 17, 2014 01:49
This is still happening in 4.3.4f1. Please help.
Pyrian
May 12, 2014 14:57
What's the point of even having a kinematic rigidbody if it still doesn't interact with static colliders? It's barely distinct from a static collider at this point. The documentation suggests that static colliders shouldn't move and if you need to move a collider by script, you should give it a kinematic rigidbody, but that does not work; if you want your object to interact with static colliders, kinematic rigidbodies, or even unmoving non-kinematic rigidbodies, you have to give it a non-kinematic rigidbody and use code to force its position - which is another thing you supposedly shouldn't do.
Saxi
May 09, 2014 15:08
By design? it should match the 3D functionality and be consistent.
Rafes
May 05, 2014 04:26
Note. Use at your own risk: With gravity at 0 and the collider set to trigger, it seems to work as I need it to (someone else here mentioned this might work). This may not be a great solution but since I am not moving the object directly (moved by parent) I think it is OK. In the 3D system you should never move a non-kinematic rigidbody using the transform. I have no idea if that is true here. I'm not even sure why it moves with its parent instead of being left behind, but it moves....