Search Issue Tracker

By Design

Votes

0

Found in

2019.4

2020.2.0b2

2021.1

Issue ID

1280961

Regression

No

Changing the Profiler Frame Count size doesn't affect the data loading time when loading from a file

Profiling

-

How to reproduce:
1. Open the attached project (case-1280961.zip)
2. Open the Profiler window (Window -> Analysis -> Profiler)
3. Enable 'Deep Profile' (just to make the issue easier to reproduce)
4. Enter Play Mode and exit it when the Profiler records more than 2000 frames
5. Save the profiling data to a file
6. Load the newly created data file to the Profiler and time it
7. Change the Profiler Frame Count to 300 (Edit -> Preferences -> Analysis -> Profiler)
8. Load the data file to the Profiler again and time it

Expected result: since only 300 frames are being shown, it takes less time to load the data from the file
Actual result: it takes the same time to load

Reproducible with: 2019.4.12f1, 2020.1.6f1, 2020.2.0b5, 2021.1.0a1
Could not test with: 2018.4.27f1 (changing Frame Count size not introduced)

Notes:
Increasing the Frame Count size when the data is already loaded does not reveal the hidden frames

  1. Resolution Note:

    Team resolution is to close the performance optimization issue by design as this contributes to a feature request, which we need to address anyway as a part of scalability initiative

Add comment

Log in to post comment

All about bugs

View bugs we have successfully reproduced, and vote for the bugs you want to see fixed most urgently.