Search Issue Tracker
Fixed in 5.0.X
Votes
0
Found in
5.0.0a6
Issue ID
601742
Regression
No
Transition names are not informative enough
Transition names are not informative enough
2) How can we reproduce it using the example you attached
1. Make the following simple controller:
Add a state machine to the Base Layert: Machine1 add also a state: State1 (make it default state)
Add a state to the Machine1: State2
Add a state machine to the Machine1: Machine2
Add a state to the Machine2: State2
2. Make 2 transitions from the State1:
Transition1: to the State2 inside the Machine1
Transition2: to the State2 inside the Machine2 (inside Machine1)
3. Select the State1 and notice in the Inspector there ate two identical transitions. Users will be unable to tell which one is which. Including a hierarchy would be helpful here.
All about bugs
View bugs we have successfully reproduced, and vote for the bugs you want to see fixed most urgently.
Latest issues
- GameObjects are not rendered when using a fragment shader with RWStructuredBuffer in URP
- [Profiler] The GPU Highlight module flags the frame before the spike when using DoInference in a coroutine
- "X" missing in "Create Node" search field
- Changing Shader Graph name causes icon size issue in shader graph window tab
- [Android] Crash on SkinnedMeshRendererManager CalculateSkinningMatrices
Add comment