Search Issue Tracker

By Design

By Design in 6000.6.X

Votes

0

Found in

6000.5.0a8

6000.6.0a1

Issue ID

UUM-135926

Regression

No

Sort label is misleading when sorting Samples by Name in All Samples tab

Packman

-

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Create a new project using Universal 3D template
  2. Open the Package Manager (Window > Package Management > Package Manager)
  3. Open the "All Samples" tab
  4. Click on the "Sort:" dropdown and choose "Name (asc)" or "Name (desc)"
  5. Observe the ordering of the listed Samples

Actual results: Entries are grouped and ordered by Package Name first and only then by Sample Name, so the overall list is not globally sorted by Sample Name

Expected results: Either entries are sorted globally by Sample Name in asc/desc order, or the sort dropdown clearly indicates that sorting is primarily by Package Name (for example via separate “Sort by Package Name” and “Sort by Sample Name” options)

Reproducible with versions: 6000.5.0a8

Can’t test with versions: 6000.0.70f1, 6000.3.10f1, 6000.4.0b11, 6000.5.0a7 (Samples tab does not exist)

Tested on (OS): Windows 11

Notes:

  • The most prominent text in each row is the Sample Name, so the “Sort: Name” label appears to refer to that, even though the primary sort is by Package Name
  • Grouping by Package may be intentional; this report is about the ambiguity of the sort label and options rather than the grouping itself
  1. Resolution Note:

    Thank you for reporting a bug to Unity.

    After reviewing the behavior, we've confirmed it aligns with the current design and intended use of the feature. We understand this may differ from your expectations or workflow.

    We will close this case as 'As Designed.' If you have feedback on how the feature could better meet your needs, please let us know - we value your input and consider it in future improvements.

  2. Resolution Note (6000.6.X):

    Thank you for reporting a bug to Unity.

    After reviewing the behavior, we've confirmed it aligns with the current design and intended use of the feature. We understand this may differ from your expectations or workflow.

    We will close this case as 'As Designed.' If you have feedback on how the feature could better meet your needs, please let us know - we value your input and consider it in future improvements.

Add comment

Log in to post comment

All about bugs

View bugs we have successfully reproduced, and vote for the bugs you want to see fixed most urgently.