Search Issue Tracker
Fixed in 5.0.1
Votes
0
Found in
5.0.0b21
Issue ID
665452
Regression
No
Content issues in Mecanim FAQ
Content issues in Mecanim FAQ
Unity 5.0.0b21/Editor/Data/Documentation/en/Manual/MecanimFAQ.html
"We are using the legacy animation system for character animations. Should we be using Mecanim instead?
Mecanim is the main animation technology that will be used and developed by Unity from now on. The legacy system will not be updated significantly."
The question is not really answered. Give a decisive answer such as the answer given in section on Legacy animation system:
“Prior to the introduction of Mecanim, Unity used its own animation system and for backward compatiblity, this system is still available. The main reason for using legacy animation is to continue working with an old project without the work of updating it for Mecanim. However, it is not recommended that you use the legacy system for new projects.”
"Is there a way to create AvatarIKGoals other than LeftFoot, RightFoot, LeftHand, RightHand?
This feature is planned for a future release."
We now have also the knee and elbow IK in 5.0
All about bugs
View bugs we have successfully reproduced, and vote for the bugs you want to see fixed most urgently.
Latest issues
- Too little validation messages in the "WebAssembly Language Features" Memory settings
- Project Settings Search Highlights are misaligned when using the Bitmap Text Rendering Mode
- "GetControlID at event ValidateCommand returns a controlID different from the one in Layout event" Warning is thrown when undoing the deletion of Sprite Shape Profile
- Memory related fields in the "WebAssembly Language Features" can be set to the negative numbers
- "WebAssembly Language Features" Header in the Player Settings has a smaller indentation
Add comment