Search Issue Tracker
By Design
By Design in 1.8.X
Votes
1
Found in [Package]
1.8.4
Issue ID
BUR-2409
Regression
No
Burst does not auto-vectorize a method when the SinCos method is used
Reproduction steps:
1. Open the attached “ASDQWE” project
2. Open the “Asset/Scenes/SampleScene.unity” Scene
3. Open the Burst Inspector (Jobs > Burst > Open Inspector…)
4. Observe the “SinCos128Floats” method
Expected result: The method is automatically vectorized
Actual result: The method is not automatically vectorized and remains unoptimized
Reproducible with: 1.7.4 (2021.3.27f1), 1.8.3(2021.3.27f1), 1.8.4 (2022.3.1f1, 2023.1.0b21, 2023.2.0a18)
Reproducible on: Intel MacOS 13.3.1
Add comment
All about bugs
View bugs we have successfully reproduced, and vote for the bugs you want to see fixed most urgently.
Latest issues
- Performance Markers Search window shows an empty entry in the list
- Enabling Deep Profiling in Performance Markers Search window breaks Inspector panel buttons when navigating through the marker items
- Dragging selector from selector row background shows preview but does not apply class in UI Builder
- An "InvalidOperationException" error is thrown when TryRemoveItem is used with rebuildTree set to false
- Build fails with IL2CPP error when building on Android platform in a specific project
Resolution Note:
This is, unfortunately, by-design. LLVM's loop vectorizer is currently unable to vectorize calls that have pointer-type parameters, such as sincos.
There's some initial community [effort|https://reviews.llvm.org/D116879] to improve this situation, but that PR is from 2022 and hasn't landed yet. If LLVM gains the ability to vectorize such calls, then we'd be able to make use of it in Burst.
Resolution Note (1.8.X):
This is, unfortunately, by-design. LLVM's loop vectorizer is currently unable to vectorize calls that have pointer-type parameters, such as sincos.
There's some initial community [effort|https://reviews.llvm.org/D116879] to improve this situation, but that PR is from 2022 and hasn't landed yet. If LLVM gains the ability to vectorize such calls, then we'd be able to make use of it in Burst.